In this reading response thought-piece, the theoretical basis of the

        In this reading response thought-piece, the supposed floor of the source Han Dynasty lead be discussed in the first section of this stem and, the reasons that the Han Dynasty was more than unplayful provide be discussed in the latter(prenominal) part. Firstly, the metaphysical basis of the Han. The Han Dynasty was founded by one of only 2 commoners, in Chinese chronicle, to rise to post. This rise to military unit despite an scotch barrier of the Hans first emperor incomparablelyterfly is peradventure proof to the Hans staying position in Chinese history and, will hopefully be reflected in this thought-piece. Although thither was or so level of distress in the Empire after his death, the emperor butterfly Wen is credited with forging a sense of assiduity in the empire. emperor Wu, would also be possessed of a far- tingeing issuing in Chinese culture by imple custodyting grave changes in foreign/domestic policies. Having discussed al nigh of the more orotund figures from the Han Dynasty, we will now delve into the realm of the suppositious basis of the Han. The Han semipolitical system was a bureaucratic system; that is, there were umteen high officials who were relatively authorityful figures, but the power ceaselessly lay with the emperor. The high ranking officials, for the about part, were suppose for administrative and non governance reasons. Although, exceptions to the rule as in most things, did exist. Although form onlyy, the type of political system was emperor, with bureaucracy accompaniment, the emperor seldom delved into the lives of the commoners. This was done mostly by notables inside the corporation who achieved their locating as either wealthy landowners, merchants or individuals of elite status. As I mentioned earlier, these posts or ranks were given not for governance, but kinda administrative reasons. Although this seems to be contradictory, it actu totallyy serves as a prevention for checks and balan! ces. While the primeval political science affords them a small fare of power over the local power structure, they also go through to protect the central governments interest to obtain this luxury. To be bewilder a appendage of the government during the Han Dynasty, one commonly had to come from a family of means. Not that these posts were exclusively for the wealthy. However, to become a learned member of society, it ordinarily required formal training, and enthronement in books and materials; nighthing that a family of lesser means could obviously not afford. And because the prior Emperor Wen, personally required capable men to have to push back written examinations, which he personally gave himself. We come to see the ferocity that was put on learning in the Han Dynasty. Later, Emperor Wu would later provide patronage for the Confucian nurture of thought, and form an over-embellished University by recommendation only. This forged a sense of community because government officials were not mindless officials but rather, learned individuals with a similar ideology, one of classical learning. As the book stated, this untested found reliance weakened the absolute rule of the central government. However, the Han would continue to reign strong for some eon. Their economic polity which was to tax landowners and form monopolies on scarce resources (salt & iron) was somewhat responsible. existence that this form of tax revenue was the governments largest source of income and afforded the emperor to set off the Dynasty. Later, the Han would expand their empire by gaining tribute from coterminous foreigners, devising prudent allies and maintaining their respective conquests. However, there was some be between the peasants and the government, being that taxation increased as a result of military expansion and thus, led to revolt. So, in short, the theoretical basis of the Han Dynasty was a bureaucratic system, governed by an master emperor, who placed much credence in an educated ea! rthly uphold and a mighty military. As for the reason that the Han Dynasty was more relative than the Qin, in my opinion, is that the Qin Dynasty had unattainable expectations. By trying to consolidate all of China, they overlyk on a task of such enormity that bollix up was unequivocal. The book states that the first emperor of China, divided China into 36 commanderies, which were in turn, subdivided into countries. This process of division upon division is a logistic nightmare because of the hazardous nature of new governments. As whatsoever Empire comes into its own there is always a transition period in which positions or posts are created and power is delegated.

But to imm ediately section out the empire, all the time having to remain conscious of the threat of feudalism, which the Empire fears, is a insecure situation. Now, to guard from the former condition, due to the partitioning of China, the Emperor had to domination prominent families who might implement feudalism within the empire so he captures them and removes them from their strongholds. Clearly not the most good policy for a new empire because you will normally indirect request to have influential contacts in the scrimping so that a system of checks and balances exists. The isolation of prominent families and baleful taxation on the people may have been the theme demand to prompt revolution.         Lastly, the fact that the Qin Dynasty operated under martial law, with spendthrift penalties for rather minor offenses, (execution) fostered a sense of peril and scruple in those propagation and thus, led to the Dynastys rather choppy demise.         Â Therefore, as I conclude this rather extended thou! ght-piece on the theoretical basis of the Han Dynasty and attempt to answer why the Han Dynasty was more efficacious then the Qin Dynasty, I would have to say that the Han Dynasty had a greater sense of balance within their respective empire. Although they too had their times of strife and uncertainty, they handled their situations and problems with perspicacity. Never, until the Dynastys end, did the Empire over reach themselves or their Empires potential. They always had seemingly prudent economic as well as foreign policy, and they seemed to maintenance for their people. They bettered their Dynasty by imbuing their people,, and this emphasis on education was perhaps a boon in more ways than one. Lastly, the penalties were not excessive and barbaric. The Qin seemed to apply harsh punishment for even minor infractions, which most have been a scary time to live in because of the callosity of punishment and, rampant corruption (most likely provide by the lack of due proc ess for citizens and officials, victims of dubious claims, resulting in execution). If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay